On 16/09/13 17:55, Craig Yoshioka wrote:
Hi all,
I know it's been asked before, but just thought I'd get an update on
high availability options in dnsmasq. My preference would be to let a
backend db handle synchronization and just run two instances of
dnsmasq pointed to the same backend; one cou
Hi all,
I know it's been asked before, but just thought I'd get an update on high
availability options in dnsmasq.
My preference would be to let a backend db handle synchronization and just run
two instances
of dnsmasq pointed to the same backend; one could be set as authoritative and
the other
