On 10/13/2012 01:20 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
-
+ /* When bind-interfaces is set, there might be more than one dnmsasq
+ instance binding port 547. That's OK if they serve different
networks.
+ Need to set REUSEADDR to make this posible, or REUSEPORT on
*BS
On 10/12/2012 04:41 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 12/10/12 13:56, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 10/12/2012 06:44 AM, Simon Kelley wrote:
>OK, it is what is. Is there some practical way to "tell" dnsmasq an
>association for a hostname and an IPv6 address? I cannot see
something
>like that used to upd
On 12/10/12 13:56, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 10/12/2012 06:44 AM, Simon Kelley wrote:
>OK, it is what is. Is there some practical way to "tell" dnsmasq an
>association for a hostname and an IPv6 address? I cannot see something
>like that used to update an authoritative name server but it would b
On 10/12/2012 06:44 AM, Simon Kelley wrote:
>OK, it is what is. Is there some practical way to "tell" dnsmasq an
>association for a hostname and an IPv6 address? I cannot see something
>like that used to update an authoritative name server but it would be
>useful to have some kind of an update
On 11/10/12 19:52, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> I got a bit of a surprise today when I discovered that it is not
> possible to run more that one dhcp6 server on a single host. This
> appears to be true whether it is an ISC-dhcpd6 server and dnsmasq or two
> dnsmasq servers. They each want exclusive u
I got a bit of a surprise today when I discovered that it is not
possible to run more that one dhcp6 server on a single host. This
appears to be true whether it is an ISC-dhcpd6 server and dnsmasq or two
dnsmasq servers. They each want exclusive use of UDP6 port 547.
With IPv4, you could run