[Dnsmasq-discuss] patch to support systemd socket activation

2011-11-14 Thread 微菜
Hi there, I was once send it to our maintainers the patch for 2.57. Now I've rebased it to 2.59 and resend it here for discussion. This patch enables dnsmasq to support systemd socket activation. #systemctl enable dnsmasq.socket #systemctl enable dnsmasq-tftp.socket Then if some one try to acc

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] patch to support systemd socket activation

2011-11-14 Thread Simon Kelley
On 14/11/11 09:19, 微菜 wrote: > Hi there, > > I was once send it to our maintainers the patch for 2.57. > Now I've rebased it to 2.59 and resend it here for discussion. I remember the previous discussion. In the meantime, support for systemd activation support has been added to the Debian package

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] patch to support systemd socket activation

2011-11-14 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Hi Simon, Excerpts from Simon Kelley's message of 2011-11-14 20:15:25 +: > I'm not a systemd expert, by any means, (I didn't write the code above) > but I'd like to understand the advantages and problems with the two > methods of activation (DBus and socket) Well, the socket activation version

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] patch to support systemd socket activation

2011-11-15 Thread Jan Seiffert
2011/11/14 Michael Stapelberg : > Hi Simon, > > Excerpts from Simon Kelley's message of 2011-11-14 20:15:25 +: >> I'm not a systemd expert, by any means, (I didn't write the code above) >> but I'd like to understand the advantages and problems with the two >> methods of activation (DBus and soc

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] patch to support systemd socket activation

2011-11-17 Thread Sergei Zhirikov
On 2011-11-15 10:01, Jan Seiffert wrote: 2011/11/14 Michael Stapelberg: Hi Simon, Excerpts from Simon Kelley's message of 2011-11-14 20:15:25 +: I'm not a systemd expert, by any means, (I didn't write the code above) but I'd like to understand the advantages and problems with the two metho

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] patch to support systemd socket activation

2011-11-17 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Hi Sergei, Excerpts from Sergei Zhirikov's message of 2011-11-17 19:02:22 +: > some good ideas in its design, but the one of socket activation, IMO, is > blown up to the point of being ridiculous. Everyone seems to be adding socket I think it’s very elegant and useful. > activation support to

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] patch to support systemd socket activation

2011-11-18 Thread Ilya Evseev
2011/11/17 Sergei Zhirikov > So having TFTP socket activation without DHCP would not be very useful in > practice. It is very useful, when you have tons of statically configured routers :) TFTP is used for downloading/uploading configs and firmwares. And DHCP is not needed at all. WBR, Ilya

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] patch to support systemd socket activation

2023-10-27 Thread Max Nikulin
Hi, In the year 2011 there was a discussion of systemd socket activation for systemd and the patches were resend in 2012. https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2011q4/005324.html https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2012q3/006193.html An example of objec