On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 12:11:19AM -0400, Jack YAPI wrote:
> We do use dnsmasq 2.85 but any newer versions passed 2.85 result in "config
> error is REFUSED (EDE:not ready)".
> I saw a patch was made to handle the address type in
> https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2021q3/015
On Thu, 2021-09-23 at 11:00 +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
> I just pushed a pretty straightforward patch to fix this.
Can confirm this fixes it.
Best,
Dominik
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelle
Hi Simon,
Thank you for the patch, and the explanation.
Best,
Jean-Philippe
Le 23/09/2021 à 12:00, Simon Kelley a écrit :
Apologies all.
The
--address=/#/..
functionality got omitted in the 2.86 domain-search rewrite, which
explains everything. Treating # as a domain name, it doesn't m
Apologies all.
The
--address=/#/..
functionality got omitted in the 2.86 domain-search rewrite, which
explains everything. Treating # as a domain name, it doesn't match the
test domain, so dnsmasq tries to forward upstream. There are no upstream
servers configured, so it returns REFUSED.
I
Hi Dominik,
Thank you for trying.
Le 22/09/2021 à 14:05, Dominik Derigs a écrit :
Hey Jean-Philippe,
The config is different in your two tries, but I guess this is
just a typo.
Yes.
Anyway, I repeated your test on latest master and it is still
showing the same as v2.86.
Yes, on my side
Hey Jean-Philippe,
The config is different in your two tries, but I guess this is
just a typo.
> --address='/#/127.0.1'
> --address='/#/127.0.0.1'
Anyway, I repeated your test on latest master and it is still
showing the same as v2.86.
On Wed, 2021-09-22 at 12:29 +0200, Jean-Philippe Lambert w
Hello,
I tried to simplify my example.
With dnsmasq v2.86, I am not able to use the catch-all form of the
address parameter any more, while it still worked for v2.85.
Is this a bug or am I missing some parameter?
With v.2.86 I get the message 'config error is REFUSED (EDE: not ready)'
for a