Re: [DNSOP] reverse-mapping issue 19: confusing example

2007-06-26 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 03:14:14PM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > Issue 17: the term "in use" in section 4.2 is not clear. Er, issue 19, of course. Thanks to those who pointed out just how badly the southern Ontario heat is affecting my pea brain! A -- Andrew Sullivan

Re: [DNSOP] reverse-mapping issue 18: RFC 1912

2007-06-26 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 02:44:41PM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote: > >[RFC1912] suggests that it is an operational or > >configuration error not to have matching PTR and A records. > Every address should have a PTR which gives the cannonical name > of the host which