(Thread originated on main IETF mailing list...)
In a discussion concerning new TLD names and namespace collisions that
might (and to
some extent, are likely to) occur, Mark Andrews wrote:
So the "problem" isn't whether some string not listed in 2606
can be allocated, it is how it is used afte
> (Thread originated on main IETF mailing list...)
>
> In a discussion concerning new TLD names and namespace collisions that
> might (and to
> some extent, are likely to) occur, Mark Andrews wrote:
> >> So the "problem" isn't whether some string not listed in 2606
> >> can be allocated, it is h
Mark Andrews wrote:
names which do not terminate in "." (and in some cases, which might not
permit such name termination).
Consider the label "foo.bar", a stub resolver, a recursive resolver, new
TLD "bar", and existing SLD "example.com".
Partially qualified domains and search l
