In message , Ted Lemon writes
:
> On Sep 7, 2009, at 6:52 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > /56 should be typical for homes
> > /48 should be typical for businesses
>
> I don't think this is germane to the discussion. My point in
> mentioning /64 was simply that if you go narrower than that
On Sep 7, 2009, at 6:52 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
/56 should be typical for homes
/48 should be typical for businesses
I don't think this is germane to the discussion. My point in
mentioning /64 was simply that if you go narrower than that, important
things break, so it's a
In message <4aa58174.6010...@mail-abuse.org>, Douglas Otis writes:
> On 9/5/09 5:53 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> > I claim that we need to provide support for the network that people
> > are actually building. That often includes things that we would not
> > do ourselves, and that we think would
In message <63fd8b00-b74f-465e-95c8-129a69f52...@nominum.com>, Ted Lemon writes
:
> On Sep 3, 2009, at 6:37 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > First what DoS that doesn't exist today? Updates already get sent
> > to the ISP's {IN-ADDR,IP6}.ARPA servers.
>
> If you do prefix delegation, you're delegatin
On 9/5/09 5:53 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
I claim that we need to provide support for the network that people
are actually building. That often includes things that we would not
do ourselves, and that we think would be better done otherwise.
There are valid reasons to formally make statements
On Sep 3, 2009, at 3:37 PM, Lee Howard wrote:
I agree that I don't like this answer, and I think I said that in
the draft,
for exactly those reasons. If this draft is worth pursuing but you
think
section 3 is unclear, could you help me improve it?
The problem with section 3 is that aside f
On Sep 3, 2009, at 6:37 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
First what DoS that doesn't exist today? Updates already get sent
to the ISP's {IN-ADDR,IP6}.ARPA servers.
If you do prefix delegation, you're delegating typically 64 bits of
address space. If you allow your customer to do arbitrary DNS
upd
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 09:03:12AM -0400,
Edward Lewis wrote
a message of 67 lines which said:
> Without zone transfers, this approach lacks interoperability. The
> master and slaves have to be the same make.
No, they have "only" to use the same algorithm. One can be in C++ as a
PowerDNS bac
