James Seng wrote:
"There is a genuine user problem here (though whether one should
actually solve it is still an open question)."
If DNS was run more like a search system the possibilities of address
resolution are endless. The same is true of ENUM lookups as well. All we
need is Root Search S
James Seng wrote:
> It is not an open question it must be solved. It is a serious enough problem
> for Chinese that it must be resolve for the Chinese user. The open question
> is "how", not "if".
Wrong. The problem is solved simply reverting back to ISO 2022
by making ISO 10646 obsolete
The que
At 5:23 PM +0800 11/7/09, YAO Jiankang wrote:
>it means that there will have a potential future delegation in the DNS root
>zone if the technical problems involved is solved.
>So IETF is a nice place to help to solve the technical problems.
True. But the draft in question does not appear to do tha
"There is a genuine user problem here (though whether one should actually
solve it is still an open question)."
It is a genuine user problem but I disagree with your latter statement.
It is not an open question it must be solved. It is a serious enough problem
for Chinese that it must be resolve
>From: Kim Davies
>Reply-To:
>To: Andrew Sullivan , "dnsop@ietf.org"
>Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-yao-dnsop-idntld-implementation-01.txt
>Date:Fri, 6 Nov 2009 10:19:43 -0800
> "The topic of delegation of variant TLDs and management of variant TLDs has
> been discussed broadly in the community. I
