On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Alex Bligh wrote:
There are two meachanisms to provide authenticated proof of
exsitance/non-existance in DNSSEC.
I don't believe either provides proof of existence (apart from
existence of the NSECx record).
If you can proof one, you can also proof the other :)
I
I think Olafur's point is a good one, but I'm unhappy with the prose.
Some suggested changes below.
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 08:37:16AM -0500, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote:
There are two meachanisms to provide authenticated proof of
exsitance/non-existance in DNSSEC. A clear text one and a
I think Olafur's point is a good one, but I'm unhappy with the prose.
Some suggested changes below.
Same here.
Nits:
There are to mechanisms to provide authenticated proof of
s/to/two/
Each mechanism includes a list of all the RRTYPEs present at the
s/includes/stores/
The clear text
Thanks Evan and Andrew fot translating my thoughts into better prose.
Evan, you captures my meaning.
Olafur
On 20/02/2010 4:31 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:
I think Olafur's point is a good one, but I'm unhappy with the prose.
Some suggested changes below.
Same here.
Nits:
There are to
