Re: [DNSOP] WGLC: draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-dps-framework-04.txt

2011-06-20 Thread Olafur Gudmundsson
Fredrik, On 19/06/2011 12:22 PM, Fredrik Ljunggren wrote: On 2011-06-17, at 13:31, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote: Few nits and questions below: a) DP and DSP should be included in the Definitions section 2, even though the abbreviations are are defined in section 1.2 Alternatively spell out in s

Re: [DNSOP] WGLC: draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-dps-framework-04.txt

2011-06-20 Thread Scott Rose
I have read previous versions of the draft, and skimmed this one looking at the changes. I agree that the document is (almost) ready to go. On Jun 17, 2011, at 4:31 PM, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote: > > Questions: > > c) should the DPS have a section describing if/when/how a zone (i.e. > the on

[DNSOP] Fwd: Nomcom 2011-12: Call for Volunteers

2011-06-20 Thread Stephen Morris
Any volunteers for this important function? Stephen Subject: Nomcom 2011-12: Call for Volunteers Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:56:06 -0700 (PDT) From: NomCom Chair To: IETF Announcement list The IETF nominating committee process for 2011-12 has begun.

Re: [DNSOP] WGLC: draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-dps-framework-04.txt

2011-06-20 Thread Matthijs Mekking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Fredrik, On 06/17/2011 04:56 PM, Fredrik Ljunggren wrote: > Matthjis, > > thank you for reviewing the document. The intention is to cover those > aspects you mention (key separation, number of keys and roll-over > scheme) in sections 6.4, 6.5 and