On 18/02/2013 19:05, Stephan Lagerholm wrote:
Warren Kumari, Monday, February 18, 2013 4:36 PM:
Hi all,
This is a compilation of two earlier drafts, draft-barwood-dnsop-ds-
publish and draft-wkumari-dnsop-ezkeyroll.
The basic idea remains the same -- allow operators to publish new (and
stand
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> A few minutes to discuss draft-bortzmeyer-dns-json, "JSON format to
> represent DNS data"? I'm specially interested by feedback about the
> open questions listed in section 3.6 of -00
I think your first question, about a formal mechanism for documenting the
field na
Joe Abley wrote:
>
> You could compare it to DNS RBLs, too. You don't have to like it for it
> to exist (you don't have to use it.) It doesn't need to be universally
> liked to be useful.
I agree with your point but there is also a difference. RBLs (and DNS
response policy zones) create breakage
Warren Kumari, Monday, February 18, 2013 4:36 PM:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a compilation of two earlier drafts, draft-barwood-dnsop-ds-
> publish and draft-wkumari-dnsop-ezkeyroll.
>
> The basic idea remains the same -- allow operators to publish new (and
> standby) DS records at the parent by publ
Hi all,
This is a compilation of two earlier drafts, draft-barwood-dnsop-ds-publish and
draft-wkumari-dnsop-ezkeyroll.
The basic idea remains the same -- allow operators to publish new (and standby)
DS records at the parent by publishing them in their zone, signed with their
current key.
This
In message <51228dfb.3070...@ogud.com>, Olafur Gudmundsson writes:
> Jason, in section 10 you talk about possible early removal the NTA when
> validation succeeds but there may be instances where validation succeeds
> when using a sub-set of the authoritative servers thus NTA should only
> be r
Jason, in section 10 you talk about possible early removal the NTA when
validation succeeds but there may be instances where validation succeeds
when using a sub-set of the authoritative servers thus NTA should only
be removed if all servers are providing "good" signatures.
Furthermore what to
Thanks for catching that - will correct this in -05.
Jason
On 2/18/13 10:57 AM, "Marco Davids (SIDN)" wrote:
>Jason,
>
>On 17/02/2013 10:22, Livingood, Jason wrote:
>>> Based on feedback yesterday on the list, I did a quick 04 update
>
>Personally I would also have changed all references to RF
Dear WG,
> Please respond by the end of next week, so that we could ask future
> editors to submit a renamed -00 version by Monday, Feb 18.
thanks to all who responded and especially to those three volunteer
reviewers. However, we've not met the 5 reviewer threshold, so your
chairs agreed the WG
On Feb 17, 2013, at 10:22 AM, "Livingood, Jason"
wrote:
> Based on feedback yesterday on the list, I did a quick –04 update, which is
> now at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-livingood-negative-trust-anchors/.
>
>
> The are seven open issues documented at the end of the I-D. But t
On Feb 18, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Feb 18, 2013, at 2:05 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 12:14:46PM +0100,
>> Peter Koch wrote
>> a message of 12 lines which said:
>>
>>> we would also like to solicit suggestions for agenda items from you.
>>
On Feb 18, 2013, at 2:05 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 12:14:46PM +0100,
> Peter Koch wrote
> a message of 12 lines which said:
>
>> we would also like to solicit suggestions for agenda items from you.
>
> A few minutes to discuss draft-bortzmeyer-dns-json, "JSON fo
Jason,
On 17/02/2013 10:22, Livingood, Jason wrote:
>> Based on feedback yesterday on the list, I did a quick –04 update
Personally I would also have changed all references to RFC4641 into RFC6781.
Regards,
--
Marco
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf
On 17/02/2013 10:22, Livingood, Jason wrote:
Based on feedback yesterday on the list, I did a quick –04 update, which
is now at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-livingood-negative-trust-anchors/.
The are seven open issues documented at the end of the I-D. But the most
important questions
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 12:14:46PM +0100,
Peter Koch wrote
a message of 12 lines which said:
> we would also like to solicit suggestions for agenda items from you.
A few minutes to discuss draft-bortzmeyer-dns-json, "JSON format to
represent DNS data"? I'm specially interested by feedback abo
15 matches
Mail list logo