On 14/11/2014 7:20 am, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote:
Dear DNSOP Chairs,
We are requesting a call for adoption of
draft-wkumari-dnsop-root-loopback.
W
Support adoption, and will review.
T.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
In your previous mail you wrote:
This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-dickinson-dnsop-5966-bis
= I support the adoption (even there are many points I disagree,
BTW it is more a reason to adopt it :-). I'll review it, etc.
Regards
francis.dup...@fdupont.fr
Some comments:
- 4 page 5: It (TCP)
SHOULD NOT be used only for zone transfers and as a fallback.
this SHOULD NOT is very hard to implement without dubious
interpretations (i.e., the idea is right but the current wording
could lead to unexpected/unwanted results).
- 5 page 4: both
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Suzanne Woolf suzworldw...@gmail.com wrote:
Colleagues,
This call for adoption closed earlier this week, during IETF91.
We see significant support in the WG for working on
draft-vandergaast-dnsop-edns-client-subnet. We're adopting it as a WG item.
Thanks
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group
of the IETF.
Title : Client Subnet in DNS Requests
Authors : Carlo Contavalli
