On Friday, November 14, 2014, Wolfgang Nagele (AusRegistry)
wolfgang.nag...@ausregistry.com.au wrote:
Hi,
AS112 absolutely proves that unowned anycast can work at scale; that's
not
my concern. But if my neighbor announces a route to the AS112 addresses,
and then misconfigures a server,
Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption
by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
Yes, I think the WG should adopt it. It has some editorial issues, and perhaps
should explain why it doesn't allow, e.g., root on the same LAN rather than only
Hi
In case I wasn't clear enough, the chairs will accept all the emails
supporting the CfA from warren's previous email, so you'll not need to
resend.
thanks
tim
On 11/16/14 1:45 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-wkumari-dnsop-root-loopback
The draft is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/16/14 1:45 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
|
| This starts a Call for Adoption for
| draft-wkumari-dnsop-root-loopback
I have read the draft, I support its adoption, and I will review and
contribute text as necessary.
It should come as no surprise
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 03:12:58PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
Before commenting further I'd love the authors to flesh
out their reasoning for not simply slaving the zone where possible.
I'm not one of the authors, but I can give you an answer: in BIND,
and I believe in other DNS implementations
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 02:28:19PM -0800, Tim Wicinski wrote:
In case I wasn't clear enough, the chairs will accept all the emails
supporting the CfA from warren's previous email, so you'll not need to
resend.
I can't remember if I already said I supported adoption. If so, I
support adoption
