On 2/12/15, 2:54 PM, George Michaelson
g...@algebras.orgmailto:g...@algebras.org wrote:
we've got two agencies who do DNS, and probably have 20% worldwide eyeball
share in DNS (I don't know, thats a guesstimate) now doing edns0_client_subnet
albiet with whitelist, so its a permit-list, but
On 12Feb15, George Michaelson allegedly wrote:
we've got two agencies who do DNS, and probably have 20% worldwide
eyeball share in DNS (I don't know, thats a guesstimate) now doing
edns0_client_subnet albiet with whitelist, so its a permit-list, but its
functionally 'there'
Whitelists are
On Feb 12, 2015, at 1:44 AM, George Michaelson g...@algebras.org wrote:
Technology wise, this is short, and simple and clear. Would we had this
before .onion eventuated, and dare I say it even .local from another time and
place. WIring a TLD to be used for alternate namespaces so that we can
The question about whitelist is the problem. I think it need to be
addressed on this doc.
There's some approaches, like Google does, doing low rate ECS query:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/public-dns-announce/67oxFjSLeUM
Or something not so traditional like TXT record on domain record
