Looking for a few folks to do a close read. Send notes to the list, and
I'll make necessary revisions. If it's baked, I think there's consensus.
I read through it. It's basically fine but of course here are a few
suggestions.
I'd redo sec 1.2 to make it clearer what the serious problems are.
There's been no discussion since this revision.
The Chairs have asked for a couple of reviews. I've asked a couple of
folks, but haven't had any response.
Looking for a few folks to do a close read. Send notes to the list, and
I'll make necessary revisions. If it's baked, I think there's
Commenting on an old draft I had worked/started with Lee on many years
ago!
1) The intro should make it clear that this document DOES NOT recommend
any solutions, it just describe the trade-offs. In fact, none of the
solutions are really good.
2) there should be a longer discussion of hosts
The following errata report has been verified for RFC7477,
Child-to-Parent Synchronization in DNS.
--
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7477eid=4307
--
Status: Verified
Lee,
I will read through this in the next day or so.
Thanks,
Sean
On Mar 31, 2015, at 9:46 AM, Lee Howard l...@asgard.org wrote:
There's been no discussion since this revision.
The Chairs have asked for a couple of reviews. I've asked a couple of
folks, but haven't had any response.
