On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 06:48:29AM -0400,
Tim WIcinski wrote
a message of 30 lines which said:
> Please review the draft and offer relevant comments. Remember: This
> draft is not attempting to redefine any definitions, but to collect
> and formalize the definitions which do exist.
>
> Becaus
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 1:15 AM, Andrew Sullivan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 04:10:53PM -0400, Bob Harold wrote:
> >
> > Stealth server -- This is the same as a slave server except that it
> >is not listed in an NS resource record for the zone. (Quoted from
> >[RFC1996], sec
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 8:28 PM, wrote:
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations Working
> Group of the IETF.
>
> Title : DNS Terminology
> Authors : Pa
On Apr 20, 2015, at 6:43 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> IMHO, the text can NOT be published with its definition of Forwarder.
>
> The definition of Forwarder is still both confused and
> self-contradictory.
Yes. There are differences between the explicit definition for DNS forwarder in
RFC 23
On Apr 20, 2015, at 9:34 AM, Shumon Huque wrote:
> I advise a small correction on the last sentence of this paragraph:
>
> >Authoritative server -- A system that responds to DNS queries with
> >information about zones for which it has been configured to answer
> >with the AA flag in
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group
of the IETF.
Title : Add 100.64.0.0/10 prefixes to IPv4 Locally-Served DNS
Zones Registry.
Author : M.
