On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:05 PM Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzme...@nic.fr
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:35:29AM -0400,
Shumon Huque shu...@gmail.com wrote
a message of 400 lines which said:
Are we standardizing on the british spelling of minimisation in
preference to the americanized
In message 556ea478.80...@redhat.com, Petr Spacek writes:
Hello,
I would like early feedback about following idea about interaction between DN
S
updates (RFC 2136) and classless IN-ADDR.ARPA delegation (RFC 2317).
In short, the RFC 2317 tells me to fill reverse zone with CNAMEs pointing
Whilst discussing 5966-bis with my co-authors connection-close with the
co-authors, we were reminded of this point I made in
draft-bellis-dnsop-connection-close in relation to §7 of RFC 6891:
TODO: note - the constraint in RFC 6891 appears unnecessarily strict
- it appears to mandate that
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 08:40:16AM +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
Could this be added to agenda for IETF 93? Does it make sense to discuss
it there?
Unfortunately I won't be in Prague, but I do expect to be in Yokohama.
If you or someone else would like to push the idea forward in my absence,
that's
Ray,
On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 13:57:39 +0100
Ray Bellis r...@bellis.me.uk wrote:
Whilst discussing 5966-bis with my co-authors connection-close with the
co-authors, we were reminded of this point I made in
draft-bellis-dnsop-connection-close in relation to §7 of RFC 6891:
TODO: note - the
