On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Suzanne Woolf suzworldw...@gmail.com
wrote:
(No hats, and no strong feelings-- a minor point.)
On Jul 8, 2015, at 11:11 PM, Evan Hunt e...@isc.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 09:50:09PM -0400, Warren Kumari wrote:
Less flippantly, it is in this email:
On 7/7/15, 8:28 PM, DNSOP on behalf of hellekin dnsop-boun...@ietf.org
on behalf of helle...@gnu.org wrote:
In my opinion, what we need is already there, and is called RFC6761.
Now I'm all ears for what needs to be done to enhance RFC6761 process.
Here is a short list:
- RFC6761 does not say
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 11:29:11AM -0400, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote:
Strictly speaking the minimum time needed for a Negative Trust anchor is
something like
Domain_Operator_reaction_time + Parent_reaction_time + Parent DS TTL +
DNSKEY TTL
Valid point. When the NTA for a name expires, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/08/2015 08:36 AM, Suzanne Woolf wrote:
It further seems to me that an attempt to list names that are
currently in the public root zone or might someday be in the public
root zone has a high risk of being simply backwards if the purpose
David Conrad writes:
In the past, ISO-3166/MA maintained a color-coded decoding table that
clearly identified the user assigned 2-letter ISO codes. However, for
reasons that I'm sure made sense to someone, they stopped publishing the
decoding table
Hi, thanks for the response. Comments inline--I've deleted text that
doesn't seem to require further discussion.
Ben.
On 8 Jul 2015, at 21:59, Warren Kumari wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Ben Campbell b...@nostrum.com wrote:
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
Warren Kumari writes:
This number comes from Evan :-)
Less flippantly, it is in this email:
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg13004.html I
don't think that we have a really good motivation for a week, other
than that is feels sort of like a good, human
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors-10: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
(No hats, and no strong feelings-- a minor point.)
On Jul 8, 2015, at 11:11 PM, Evan Hunt e...@isc.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 09:50:09PM -0400, Warren Kumari wrote:
Less flippantly, it is in this email:
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg13004.html I
don't think
