On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 11:14:38 PM Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015, Paul Vixie wrote:
> > as the author of the first prototype, let me say that the client side
> > proxy's only knowledge of its server side proxy is its IP address,
> > whereas SSL needs a host name. i'd be happy t
On Wed, 16 Dec 2015, Paul Vixie wrote:
as the author of the first prototype, let me say that the client side proxy's
only knowledge of its server
side proxy is its IP address, whereas SSL needs a host name. i'd be happy to
have all that specified by
people who understand it, alone with client-
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:50 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 09:08:03 PM Robert Edmonds wrote:
>
> > Shane Kerr wrote:
>
> > > I have updated the DNS over HTTP review document that I sent some days
>
> > > ago. Thanks to Jinmei for reading it.
>
> > >
>
> > > As I mention
On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 09:08:03 PM Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Shane Kerr wrote:
> > I have updated the DNS over HTTP review document that I sent some days
> > ago. Thanks to Jinmei for reading it.
> >
> > As I mentioned before, if there is interest then my co-authors and I
> > are happy to t
Shane Kerr wrote:
> I have updated the DNS over HTTP review document that I sent some days
> ago. Thanks to Jinmei for reading it.
>
> As I mentioned before, if there is interest then my co-authors and I
> are happy to try to get the working group to adopt the document. If
> there is not interest,
Given a conversation about DNS over DTLS, DNS over TCP, I think a body of
work exploring the simple mapping over HTTP/HTTPS makes perfect sense and
is more about the DNS than its about the underlying transport.
So I'm in support, adopt.
-George
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Shane Kerr
wrote
Hello,
I have updated the DNS over HTTP review document that I sent some days
ago. Thanks to Jinmei for reading it.
As I mentioned before, if there is interest then my co-authors and I
are happy to try to get the working group to adopt the document. If
there is not interest, then we are happy to
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-08: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to h
+1
Very good work by all involved.
Now, just need to have a similar document for the DNS protocol itself :)
Regards,
-drc
> On Dec 15, 2015, at 5:06 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
>
> I want to give a big thanks to the authors and the working group for the
> painstaking approach to completing th
