Re: [DNSOP] [regext] Any interest in draft-latour-dnsoperator-to-rrr-protocol ?

2016-02-16 Thread joel jaeggli
On 2/16/16 1:05 PM, Barry Leiba wrote: >>> I think it would fall under REGEXT once it's up? The REGEXT charter >>> has a section about DNS Operator. >>> The working group will also identify the requirements for a registration protocol where a third-party DNS provider is involved. The

Re: [DNSOP] [regext] Any interest in draft-latour-dnsoperator-to-rrr-protocol ?

2016-02-16 Thread Barry Leiba
>> I think it would fall under REGEXT once it's up? The REGEXT charter >> has a section about DNS Operator. >> >>> The working group will also identify the requirements for a >>> registration protocol where a third-party DNS provider is involved. >>> These requirements will be documented in an Info

[DNSOP] Document Action: 'DNS query name minimisation to improve privacy' to Experimental RFC (draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-09.txt)

2016-02-16 Thread The IESG
The IESG has approved the following document: - 'DNS query name minimisation to improve privacy' (draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-09.txt) as Experimental RFC This document is the product of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Benoit Claise and Joel

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-curdle-dnskey-ed25519-01.txt

2016-02-16 Thread Shane Kerr
Ondřej, Thanks! This addresses my main concern with the proposal. This seems fine to me - perhaps even a first step to deprecating ECDSA. ;) Cheers, -- Shane At 2016-02-16 10:44:26 +0100 Ondřej Surý wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > Robert and I have prepared a new version of Ed25519 curve for u

Re: [DNSOP] Any interest in draft-latour-dnsoperator-to-rrr-protocol ?

2016-02-16 Thread joel jaeggli
On 2/16/16 7:09 AM, Jacques Latour wrote: > Hi, > > I think it would fall under REGEXT once it's up? The REGEXT charter has a > section about DNS Operator. > >> The working group will also identify the requirements for a >> registration protocol where a third-party DNS provider is involved. >> T

Re: [DNSOP] Any interest in draft-latour-dnsoperator-to-rrr-protocol ?

2016-02-16 Thread Jacques Latour
Hi, I think it would fall under REGEXT once it's up? The REGEXT charter has a section about DNS Operator. > The working group will also identify the requirements for a > registration protocol where a third-party DNS provider is involved. > These requirements will be documented in an Informationa

[DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-curdle-dnskey-ed25519-01.txt

2016-02-16 Thread Ondřej Surý
Dear colleagues, Robert and I have prepared a new version of Ed25519 curve for use in DNSSEC that has been adopted in CURDLE WG. The draft now comes with more reasoning why picking yet-another curve over the NIST curves already standardized. Feedback, nits and improvements are always welcome.