Hello,
version 08 is the first one I reviewed so this should be viewed as
first-time-reader's point of view.
Let me express my support for this work before we dive into deficiencies
of version 08:
I support moving this forward because I believe that this document has
potential to serve as an exce
Phillip Hallam-Baker writes:
> There are two reasons for splitting out the VRF [...]
Thanks, Phill! Those were our thoughts as well. Though the VRF
appendix is still included in -04, the VRF document has already been
started. It is planned that the appendix will disappear (to be
replaced with
There are two reasons for splitting out the VRF
1) It is a useful building block
2) The intersection between the people who really understand the VRF math
and really understand DNS is very small
I think most DNSOps folk will want to treat VRF as a black box and let the
crypto folk put what they
Hi folks,
We've requested an agenda slot at the DNSOP working group meeting at
IETF98 to talk about the NSEC5 protocol. Our chairs have requested that
we send out a note to the group ahead of time, so here it is.
This protocol has not to our knowledge been presented at dnsop before,
but has been
