[DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps and draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld

2017-03-12 Thread Jari Arkko
For what it is worth, reviewed these documents today as an interested individual, and both seem to be OK from my (very limited DNS expertise) perspective. Thanks for your work on this important space. I did have a few mostly editorial comments though. In sutld-ps, Section 3: There are sev

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps and draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld

2017-03-12 Thread Ted Lemon
On Mar 12, 2017, at 7:10 AM, Jari Arkko wrote: > Was name allocation part really 10x more than the rest of > the protocol development? I was not paying much > attention to the topic at the time, but I thought there > also other issues. Yes, it really was. I was a participant in that process, so

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps and draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld

2017-03-12 Thread Warren Kumari
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Jari Arkko wrote: > For what it is worth, reviewed these documents today > as an interested individual, and both seem to be OK > from my (very limited DNS expertise) perspective. Thank you. > > Thanks for your work on this important space. > > I did have a few m

Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption draft-vixie-dns-rpz

2017-03-12 Thread joel jaeggli
On 3/10/17 5:07 AM, Warren Kumari wrote: > Once a document becomes a WG document the authors are required to > incorporate WG consensus. > > If this does not / is not happening, the chairs have the option / > responsibility to replace the authors with ones that do... If there's no consensus for a

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps and draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld

2017-03-12 Thread Jari Arkko
Thanks for the explanation, Warren. Makes sense. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

[DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld

2017-03-12 Thread Suzanne Woolf
This message opens a Working Group Last Call for: "The ALT Special Use Top Level Domain" https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/ Intended status: Proposed Standard Per the discussion in our interim meeting a couple o

Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption draft-vixie-dns-rpz

2017-03-12 Thread Paul Wouters
On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, joel jaeggli wrote: On 3/10/17 5:07 AM, Warren Kumari wrote: Once a document becomes a WG document the authors are required to incorporate WG consensus. If this does not / is not happening, the chairs have the option / responsibility to replace the authors with ones that d

Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld

2017-03-12 Thread Paul Wouters
On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, Suzanne Woolf wrote: This message opens a Working Group Last Call for: "The ALT Special Use Top Level Domain" https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/ Intended status: Proposed Standard Per the discussion in our interim meeting a couple of weeks ago, the e

Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption draft-vixie-dns-rpz

2017-03-12 Thread Dave Crocker
On 3/12/2017 4:23 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: I do not want to adopt it unmodified as informational RFC for running existing code. You do not want the IETF to document existing practice? Really? d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net ___

Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption draft-vixie-dns-rpz

2017-03-12 Thread william manning
Joel, I'd be happy to see the document proceed under two conditions: 1) it becomes a WG document, subject to IETF change control, and 2) that the disclaimer requested back on 20170103 be added to the document. To refresh the collective mind, here is the missing text: applicability statement. Th