On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Peter van Dijk
wrote:
> Thank you for taking the time for this.
My pleasure; this topic has frequently been on my mind over the past
several years. Thank you for drafting it.
*Section 3.1*
>>
>
>> This section calls for limiting the TTL of cached address records
Hello Richard,
On 9 Apr 2017, at 3:38, Richard Gibson wrote:
I'm happy to see progress being made on this front. Some comments:
Thank you for taking the time for this.
*Section 3.1*
This section calls for limiting the TTL of cached address records to
the
lesser of the ANAME TTL and the TT
The DNSOP WG has placed draft-hunt-dnsop-aname in state
Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Tim Wicinski)
The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hunt-dnsop-aname/
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.or