The Call For Adoption ended some time ago, and I spent some time reading the comments.
There is consensus to adopt this, *but* there is also a enough of an concern that some of the issues raised be addressed. We'll want to make sure all issues are addressed. tim On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 5:12 AM, Petr Špaček <petr.spa...@nic.cz> wrote: > > > On 9.10.2017 22:20, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews wrote: > > On 10/09/2017 01:16 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: > >> So, that's my (new) views, and the thread seemed to have stalled. I > >> believe that the security implications of having localhost queries > >> leak into the DNS is bad, and there is significant evidence that this > >> is happening. I get that there is no answer that will make everyone > >> happy, but now that we've had some time to mull over this, where did > >> we end up? > > My feeling of the list is that your view matches the rough consensus: > > stub resolvers are responsible for resolving localhost to 127.0.0.1, and > > queries for localhost should not hit the network, as described in the > draft. > > I agree, consider it as one data point in your "rough consensus" > estimation. > > -- > Petr Špaček @ CZ.NIC > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
