[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-woodworth-bulk-rr-07.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF. Title : BULK DNS Resource Records Authors : John Woodworth Dean Ballew

Re: [DNSOP] Agenda topics for IETF100

Need a short slot (5 mn) about the revision of TSIG specs just submitted as draft-dupont-dnsop-rfc2845bis-00.txt Thanks francis.dup...@fdupont.fr PS: there are in fact only a few since IETF99: just the work is in progress and should one day become a WG item. IMHO today the main difference is

[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale-00.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF. Title : Serving Stale Data to Improve DNS Resiliency Authors : David C Lawrence

Re: [DNSOP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6781 (5174)

Thanks! Verified. W On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 2:24 AM, Matthijs Mekking wrote: > Hi, > > This errata appears to be valid. In addition, the following text must also > be corrected, from: > >The rest of the zone data has the same signature as the SOA record, >i.e.,

[DNSOP] [Errata Verified] RFC6781 (5174)

The following errata report has been verified for RFC6781, "DNSSEC Operational Practices, Version 2". -- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5174 -- Status: Verified Type: Technical

[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-tale-dnsop-serve-stale-02.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF. Title : Serving Stale Data to Improve DNS Resiliency Authors : David C Lawrence

[DNSOP] Agenda topics for IETF100

All Please submit any request for presenting at IETF100 to the chairs. We'll be working on a draft agenda in the interim. thanks tim ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Re: [DNSOP] draft-huston-kskroll-sentinel - naming format?

> I see that this draft uses a syntax similar to RFC 8145 Trust Anchor > Telemetry RFC (which uses _ta-) albeit without the leading > underscore, i.e. .ta-. > > I'd like to propose instead ._ta. > > This would allow _ta to be registered as a standalone entry in the > underscore label registry,

[DNSOP] draft-huston-kskroll-sentinel - naming format?

I see that this draft uses a syntax similar to RFC 8145 Trust Anchor Telemetry RFC (which uses _ta-) albeit without the leading underscore, i.e. .ta-. I'd like to propose instead ._ta. This would allow _ta to be registered as a standalone entry in the underscore label registry, whilst also avoid

Re: [DNSOP] Multiple question drafts?

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 03:33:00PM +, Ray Bellis wrote a message of 24 lines which said: > Multiple answers: Also draft-fujiwara-dnsop-additional-answers ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org

[DNSOP] Multiple question drafts?

WG chairs Could you please let me / the WG know where we stand with the various drafts describing ways to accommodate multiple questions and/or answers in a single request? Multiple questions: - draft-bellis-dnsext-multi-qtypes - draft-yao-dnsop-accompanying-questions Multiple answers: -

[DNSOP] draft-fujiwara-dnsop-additional-answers-00.txt

Hello, I submitted another multiple response proposal. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fujiwara-dnsop-additional-answers-00 It is similar to draft-wkumari-dnsop-multiple-responses, however, it proposes authoritative DNS server software developers choose additional resource records. # Many

Re: [DNSOP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6781 (5174)

Hi, This errata appears to be valid. In addition, the following text must also be corrected, from: The rest of the zone data has the same signature as the SOA record, i.e., an RRSIG created with DNSKEY_K_14. to: The rest of the zone data has the same signature as the SOA record,