draft-wkumari-dnsop-internal-00 says "This document requests that the
.internal TLD be assigned to the IANA (similar to the way that
.example is) and a DNSSEC insecure delegation (that is, a delegation
with no DS records) be inserted into the root-zone, delegated to
blackhole-[12].iana.org."
This
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 11:07:54PM -0400,
tjw ietf wrote
a message of 202 lines which said:
> As you can see, we have time for our Monday Morning slot of 2.5 hours.
> Because of this, we're currently planning on giving back the Thursday
> meeting slot.
Any news on that? The monday session col
I can summarize ENS for you.
It takes 4 out of 7 geeks to bypass the blockchain in case of emergency, court
orders or kneecaps.
According to the presentation held at ICANN60
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 10, 2017, at 17:46, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 11:07:54PM -04
> On Nov 10, 2017, at 7:12 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> draft-wkumari-dnsop-internal-00 says "This document requests that the
> .internal TLD be assigned to the IANA (similar to the way that
> .example is) and a DNSSEC insecure delegation (that is, a delegation
> with no DS records) be ins
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 05:58:13PM +0530,
Paul Wouters wrote
a message of 29 lines which said:
> It takes 4 out of 7 geeks to bypass the blockchain in case of
> emergency, court orders or kneecaps.
>
> According to the presentation held at ICANN60
Well, if someone at ICANN said so, someone i
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 08:53:06AM -0500,
Matt Larson wrote
a message of 32 lines which said:
> I'll note that from a technical/mechanical perspective, ICANN's and
> Verisign's root zone management systems already know how to deal
> with delegations. A DNAME in the root would require an unknow
The ENS developer said so in response to my question.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 10, 2017, at 19:55, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 05:58:13PM +0530,
> Paul Wouters wrote
> a message of 29 lines which said:
>
>> It takes 4 out of 7 geeks to bypass the blockchain in
Can confirm, as can anyone willing to go to an Adobe Connect archive. For the
curious:
https://participate.icann.org/p6u03rimy92/?launcher=false&fcsContent=true&pbMode=normal
The discussion on Ethereum by Leonard Tan, an Ethereum developer, starts at
00:31:00. Paul’s question is at 00:42:16. Fr
in the last 20 years, there have been a few testbeds that have explored
this space.
irl.cs.ucla.edu/papers/imc71-osterweil.pdf
https://eprint.iacr.org/2013/254.pdf
that suggest Matt is spot on here. accepting any success is likely to
present the fewest problems from a user perspective.
/Wm
On
in reverse order of trustworthiness:
the root
a third party - e.g. DLV
locally verified - e.g. my employer, ISP, someone I have a binding legal
relationship with
/Wm
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Bob Harold wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Matt Larson
> wrote:
>
>> The root KSK r
In your previous mail you wrote:
> After a reading, I felt that this document needs the following:
>
> * Editing for clarity of sentences
=> I agree until the text comes from original RFCs (i.e. you are
17 year too late) or can only be clarified at the margin.
> * Addressing insufficient p
Great question Paul and thanks for getting that on record.
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 2:59 AM, David Conrad wrote:
> Can confirm, as can anyone willing to go to an Adobe Connect archive. For
> the curious:
>
> https://participate.icann.org/p6u03rimy92/?launcher=false&;
> fcsContent=true&pbMode=norm
12 matches
Mail list logo
