Re: [DNSOP] AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal

2018-06-02 Thread Warren Kumari
That works for me... W On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 3:37 PM Ted Lemon wrote: > On Jun 2, 2018, at 12:13 PM, Tom Pusateri wrote: > > The authors can discuss how they want to change this one or leave it for > later. > > > I would just suggest that we add: > > When an anycast service is configured on a

Re: [DNSOP] AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal

2018-06-02 Thread Ted Lemon
On Jun 2, 2018, at 12:13 PM, Tom Pusateri wrote: > The authors can discuss how they want to change this one or leave it for > later. I would just suggest that we add: When an anycast service is configured on a particular IP address and port, it must be the case that although there is more than

Re: [DNSOP] AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal

2018-06-02 Thread Tom Pusateri
I made all of these suggested changes on github except for the Section 3 “same server instance” pandora’s box. The authors can discuss how they want to change this one or leave it for later. If I don’t hear anything in a day or two, I’ll push out another version. Thanks, Tom > On Jun 2, 2018,

[DNSOP] AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal

2018-06-02 Thread Warren Kumari
Hi there, Thank you for writing this document, I found it clear and well written. I do have a few comments that I’d like addressed before I start IETF LC — addressing these now will avoid issues later in the process. The majority of these are nits, but one is more of a (very easily addressed) sub