Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: New draft for helping browsers use the DoH server associated with a resolver

2018-09-04 Thread Tony Finch
Paul Hoffman wrote: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hoffman-resolver-associated-doh-01 This draft specifies that the new zone is delegated to the AS112 servers, but RFC 7534 says the "direct delegation" approach is only supported for the original AS112 zones. As I understand it the plan for

Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout-00.txt

2018-09-04 Thread Tom Pusateri
> On Sep 3, 2018, at 8:58 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > SHAKE128 does not meet these requirements. In OPENSSL it is only > available in pre-release code. It will be years before OPENSSL-1.1.1 > is the OPENSSL release for most operating systems. > > We (ISC) haven’t started working out what OPE

Re: [DNSOP] Brief addition to terminology-bis draft

2018-09-04 Thread Martin Hoffmann
Paul Vixie wrote: > Suzanne Woolf wrote: > > > > Here's the definition that the authors would like to add to the > > document: > > > > > > Class: > > A class "identifies a protocol family or instance of a protocol" > > (Quoted from [RFC1034], Section 3.6). "The DNS tags all data > > wit