Section 5 says:
FOR DISCUSSION: The authors are willing to remove the Reserved field
from this specification if the working group would prefer it. It
would mean, however, that a future version of this protocol designed
to efficiently support large, dynamic zones would most likely
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : Algorithm Implementation Requirements and Usage
Guidance for DNSSEC
Authors : Paul Wouters
Dick, good catch!
Tim, do you want me to publish -04 addressing this or would it be better to fix
this in RFC Editor queue.
The diff is simple:
https://github.com/oerdnj/draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update/commit/7164f8a6ee4b210f5d83684156cb2905769f7fb4#diff-e9d2d55442440292530838192590a871
O.
On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 19:34, Tim Wicinski wrote:
The WGLC has completed and we were waiting on the authors on addressing all
> comments and updating their document.
> The chairs feel this is ready to proceed.
>
Just spotted a fumble with document references in section 3.1 which will
need to be
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : DNS Stateful Operations
Authors : Ray Bellis
Stuart Cheshire
On Oct 23, 2018, at 4:10 PM, Bob Harold wrote:
> Page 6
> "Early Data"
> The last phrase:
> "a TCP SYN message that does not use TLS
> encapsulation but contains is not permitted."
> Seems to be missing something, like "but contains early data is not
> permitted."
> Was there in the
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 3:49 PM wrote:
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the
> IETF.
>
> Title : DNS Stateful Operations
> Authors : Ray
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:02 AM Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) <
i...@kuehlewind.net> wrote:
> sorry for the delay, however, as you performed a couple of changes it took
> me a while to re-review. I believe I’m unfortunately not fully ready to
> release my discuss at this point, but close..
>
No
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : DNS Stateful Operations
Authors : Ray Bellis
Stuart Cheshire
Thanks Ondrej
The WGLC has completed and we were waiting on the authors on addressing all
comments and updating their document.
The chairs feel this is ready to proceed.
Tim
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 7:55 PM Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> thank you for the valuable feedback during
Dear colleagues,
thank you for the valuable feedback during the WGLC. I have improved the
document
based on your comments and I think it’s good to go gold.
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý
ond...@isc.org
> On 23 Oct 2018, at 19:53, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : Algorithm Implementation Requirements and Usage
Guidance for DNSSEC
Authors : Paul Wouters
> On 21 Oct 2018, at 17:40, fujiw...@jprs.co.jp wrote:
>
>> From: Vladimír Čunát
>> On 10/17/18 11:18 PM, fujiw...@jprs.co.jp wrote:
>>> 4. In my opinion, Ed25519 is best algorithm some yars later.
>>> If the document describes both current RECOMMENDATIONS and
>>> RECOMMENDATIONS some years
Fujiwara-san,
I don’t exactly understand why such table would be better than existing text
that say:
> 3.2. DNSKEY Algorithm Recommendation
>
>Operation recommendation for new and existing deployments.
>
>Due to industry-wide trend to move to elliptic curve cryptography,
>the
Thank you. I've updated in the editors copy.
W
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 7:02 PM Bob Harold wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 3:24 PM wrote:
>
>>
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System
15 matches
Mail list logo
