Thanks Benno. Thanks all reviewers for your time reviewing ATR draft. I'm
sorry it is not adopted in WG but I still think the draft and the peer
reviews help us to understand the problems better.
Davey
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: DNSOP [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Benno Overeinder
> 发送时间:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2019, Mats Dufberg wrote:
The table in section 3.3 ("DS and CDS Algorithms") of the draft states that SHA-1 is "MUST NOT" for
"DNSSEC Delegation" but in the narrative text under the table it states "SHA-1 [...] is NOT RECOMMENDED
for use in generating new DS and CDS records."
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : Algorithm Implementation Requirements and Usage
Guidance for DNSSEC
Authors : Paul Wouters
As of January 25, every TLD server is EDNS aware.
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
The table in section 3.3 ("DS and CDS Algorithms") of the draft states that
SHA-1 is "MUST NOT" for "DNSSEC Delegation" but in the narrative text under the
table it states "SHA-1 [...] is NOT RECOMMENDED for use in generating new DS
and CDS records."
The two statements should be consistent in
