Re: [DNSOP] What should ANAME-aware servers do when target records are verifiably missing?

2019-04-10 Thread Richard Gibson
Responses below. On 4/9/19 16:04, Bob Harold wrote: If it gets an authoritative answer saying that there are no address records, then it should respect that answer.  If that is incorrect, then whatever gave that answer is broken or misconfigured and should be fixed. Perhaps I am missing some

Re: [DNSOP] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update-08: (with COMMENT)

2019-04-10 Thread Paul Wouters
Thanks for the review! On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 5:30 PM Roman Danyliw via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > -- > COMMENT: > -- > > (1) Abstract. Nit. Th

[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update-09.txt

2019-04-10 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF. Title : Algorithm Implementation Requirements and Usage Guidance for DNSSEC Authors : Paul Wouters

[DNSOP] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update-08: (with COMMENT)

2019-04-10 Thread Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update-08: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please re

Re: [DNSOP] ANAME discussion

2019-04-10 Thread Vladimír Čunát
On 4/9/19 6:44 PM, Richard Gibson wrote: > If an implementation has a resolver, then that component is the > logical place for deduplication (e.g., the second inbound query for a > given ANAME target does not result in a second outbound query, but > rather waits on completion of the first). Oh, r