Re: [DNSOP] ANAME precedence [issue #58]

At Fri, 26 Apr 2019 09:16:58 +0200, Matthijs Mekking wrote: > > Also, especially if both and A sibling records are available, > > what's the purpose of ANAME in the first place if it's (effectively) > > not used? > > > > I'm sure I'm just confused and don't understand the expected usage, > >

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale-05.txt

Hi, Comment is in-line. > On 18-Apr-2019, at 4:34 PM, Davey Song wrote: > > Sorry> > > Some concerns and comments: > > 1) It sounds to me that the primary targeted outage described in this draft > is on the authoritative server during DDOS attack especially. Think about a > case of outag

Re: [DNSOP] ANAME precedence [issue #58]

On 4/25/19 8:34 PM, 神明達哉 wrote: > At Wed, 24 Apr 2019 11:44:37 +0200, > Matthijs Mekking > wrote: > >> I would like to start separate threads on the remaining issues of the >> ANAME draft. One issue that remains to be solved is whether having an A >> or record