Re: [DNSOP] ANAME in answer or additional section [issue #62]

2019-06-12 Thread Matthijs Mekking
Brian, Thanks for the detailed background on why DNAME worked. There are a few things that caught my attention: > When a recursive queried an authority server, if it got back a DNAME but did not understand it, it ignored the DNAME but processed the CNAME (as if only the CNAME existed) (plus any

Re: [DNSOP] ANAME in answer or additional section [issue #62]

2019-06-12 Thread Matthijs Mekking
On 6/12/19 4:41 AM, Joe Abley wrote: > On Jun 11, 2019, at 20:11, Anthony Eden > wrote: > >> I'm a fan of Michael's suggestion of using EDNS to signal that the >> authoritative should return ALIAS vs synthesizing. Any reason this won't >> work? > > It won't work unless it's implemented. On

Re: [DNSOP] ANAME in answer or additional section [issue #62]

2019-06-12 Thread Evan Hunt
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 08:11:51PM -0400, Anthony Eden wrote: > I'm a fan of Michael's suggestion of using EDNS to signal that the > authoritative should return ALIAS vs synthesizing. Any reason this won't > work? Not that I can think of, but it adds significant implementation complexity in order