Re: [DNSOP] Wrapping up draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements

2019-06-29 Thread Tim Wicinski
Duane/John Thanks for updating your draft. While reading it, I wanted to capture all outstanding items in the text. I found 2 TODO and 1 XXX in the draft. I include them here. - 5.2. DNS Root Zone KSK Rollover TODO: Is this "overcome by events" now? We've had 1414 byte DNSKEY

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Request for adoption: draft-sah-resolver-information

2019-06-29 Thread Paul Hoffman
On Jun 29, 2019, at 2:22 PM, Ralf Weber wrote: > > Couple of questions/remarks that may have been asked/answered (but are not > discussed in the draft thus I’m asking). > > - The draft offers two methods of retrieving the object but says nothing > about which is mandatory (Me being a lazy DNS

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Request for adoption: draft-sah-resolver-information

2019-06-29 Thread Paul Hoffman
Thanks for the review! On Jun 28, 2019, at 1:06 PM, 神明達哉 wrote: > I don't have a strong opinion on the adoption, but I'm willing to > review it. My comments on 02 follow: > > - I think the RESINFO RDATA specification (at least its wire format, > and preferably also the presentation format)

Re: [DNSOP] Request for adoption: draft-sah-resolver-information

2019-06-29 Thread Ralf Weber
Moin! On 27 Jun 2019, at 20:44, Paul Hoffman wrote: Greetings. We have again updated draft-sah-resolver-information based on comments from this mailing list. We think that this is ready for adoption by the WG so that the initial use of the protocol (to be able to determine the URI template