Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error status

2019-10-22 Thread Puneet Sood
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 2:43 AM Vladimír Čunát wrote: > > On 9/30/19 11:47 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 7:54 AM Tony Finch wrote: > >> Difficult. In general there will be multiple upstream servers, even in > >> the simplest case of a stub talking to a recursive server talki

Re: [DNSOP] Second Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error

2019-10-22 Thread Puneet Sood
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 6:49 AM Tony Finch wrote: > > Petr Špaček wrote: > > > > 2. Second problem is that it is uncelar if there is going to be a > > consumer: Did *anyone* from stub resolvers said a word about this draft? > > Is it useful as it is? > > I expect almost no-one can do anything wit

Re: [DNSOP] Second Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error

2019-10-22 Thread Tony Finch
Petr Špaček wrote: > > 2. Second problem is that it is uncelar if there is going to be a > consumer: Did *anyone* from stub resolvers said a word about this draft? > Is it useful as it is? I expect almost no-one can do anything with EDE without getaddrinfo() EAI_ return code extensions. Tony. --