> On Nov 7, 2019, at 7:56 PM, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> On 10/28/19 10:32 PM, Wessels, Duane wrote:
>> The one defined hash algorithm SHA384 has been renamed to SHA384-STABLE to
>> reflect that it designed for use on stable (or small) zones where it is not
>> burdensome to recalcu
Hi Victor
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 07:25:54PM +0530, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
> Hi Viktor
>
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 09:48:31AM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 06:25:02PM +0530, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
> > > A tool such as BIND's dnssec-keygen generates the following form
On 11/14/19 12:05 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> It'd be a shame (though admittedly not frequent) to have a resolver
> retry over TCP just to get the same answer with additional information
> it does not need and perhaps does not even understand.
EDE codes themselves take very little space, so trunc
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : Interoperable Domain Name System (DNS) Server Cookies
Authors : Ondrej Sury
> On Nov 17, 2019, at 8:35 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> Just because broken configuration don’t always cause problems doesn’t mean
> that they don’t sometimes. MTA’s need to know what names they are known
> by to properly remove MX records from consideration when performing store and
> forward. E
a correct implemention of smtp could pick up the a and from additional
data without making any additional queries. it could also ignore cname records
in the a/ response and declare that the a/ owner was wrong.
we can't break working behaviour no matter what the statistics show. a dr
> On Nov 18, 2019, at 1:00 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
> A correct implementation of SMTP could pick up the A and from
> additional data without making any additional queries.
Some resolvers return "minimal" answers and don't include additional
records. MTA's can't rely on getting addresses in
> On Nov 18, 2019, at 5:31 AM, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
>
>> I am initimately familiar with what these fields mean and the code that
>> generates it. The question is not about what the meaning of these fields
>> are.
>>
>> I am asking about where this key format is specified - I want to extend
>>
Viktor Dukhovni wrote on 2019-11-18 12:56:> ...
At the end of the day, operating outside the RFC carries some risk,
and one should not be cavalier in deploying creative deviations from
the spec. However, post-MX CNAME indirection is seen to useful by
some to stick to the spec, and since MTAs
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale-09: Recuse
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to http
10 matches
Mail list logo
