> On 11 Feb 2020, at 11:16, 神明達哉 wrote:
>
> At Sun, 9 Feb 2020 04:28:14 -0500,
> Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
>> ---> An implementation MAY also choose to represent some RRs of known type
>> ---> using the above generic representations for the type, class and/or
>> ---> RDATA, which carries the
At Sun, 9 Feb 2020 04:28:14 -0500,
Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> ---> An implementation MAY also choose to represent some RRs of known type
> ---> using the above generic representations for the type, class and/or
> ---> RDATA, which carries the benefit of making the resulting master file
> ---
Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> I was therefore surprised to find that BIND 9.14 refuses load zone files
> with TXT records in the generic form, for example named-checkzone does
> not accept:
>
> example.org.IN TXT \# 4 deadbeef
The long version of Mark's message is that a TXT record consists
Suzanne Woolf has requested publication of draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis-07 as
Informational on behalf of the DNSOP working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis/
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP
> On Feb 9, 2020, at 4:55 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> Put a valid txt record in
>
> \# 5 04deadbeef
Oops. :-( Never mind, thanks for the correction. Indeed not
forgetting the length works. FWIW, I was just double-checking
the presentation form of special characters in TXT records for
a new c
