Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-20: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please ref
On 08/04/2020 15:16, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker wrote:
>
> Also, if the firewall is "protecting" the DNS server (cough cough), then as a
> security officer I would prefer to block all unknown opcodes/types at the
> firewall (possibly with a reply).
>
See §4.
"with a reply" is fine, so long
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : Message Digest for DNS Zones
Authors : Duane Wessels
Piet Barber
Dear DNSOP,
This version of the draft includes just a couple of notable changes from the
previous
- As suggested by Mike StJohns, All apex ZONEMD RRs are now excluded from the
digest calculation. They are now all independent from each other.
- The verification procedure was clarified by descr
Pete, thanks for your review. Shumon, thanks for your response. I entered a No
Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Mar 31, 2020, at 6:44 PM, Shumon Huque wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:10 PM Pete Resnick via Datatracker
> mailto:nore...@ietf.org>> wrote:
> Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-pr
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Plea
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Ple
