Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-00.txt

> On 10 Jul 2020, at 01:34, Marek Majkowski wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 3:35 AM Mark Andrews wrote: >>> I have two problems with this proposal. First, it doesn't mention IPv4 >>> vs IPv6 differences at all. In IPv4 landscape fragmentation, while a >>> security issue, is generally fine.

Re: [DNSOP] HTTPS and SVBC key names.

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:16 AM Erik Nygren wrote: > We landed on 63 in the draft version we just published (to align with max > label lengths). > There's no reason they *need* to be short as they are just in presentation > form, so their length > comes down to usability and finding the right

Re: [DNSOP] HTTPS and SVBC key names.

This is only the presentation format—in wire format, these are alway 2-byte integers. Thus, there isn’t any effect on packet size. Thanks, Tommy > On Jul 15, 2020, at 10:34 AM, Ólafur Guðmundsson > wrote: > > DoU i.e. DNS over UDP packet size impact, > > Olafur > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020

Re: [DNSOP] HTTPS and SVBC key names.

DoU i.e. DNS over UDP packet size impact, Olafur On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 1:16 PM Erik Nygren wrote: > We landed on 63 in the draft version we just published (to align with max > label lengths). > There's no reason they *need* to be short as they are just in presentation > form, so their

Re: [DNSOP] HTTPS and SVBC key names.

We landed on 63 in the draft version we just published (to align with max label lengths). There's no reason they *need* to be short as they are just in presentation form, so their length comes down to usability and finding the right words. The longest currently is 15 and it would be better to

Re: [DNSOP] HTTPS and SVBC key names.

How about 2 or 10 ? why do the names to need to be long ? Olafur On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 10:18 PM Erik Nygren wrote: > Or 64? > > > > - Erik > > [Sent from my IPv6 connected T-Mobile 4G LTE mobile device] > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020, 9:40 PM Ben Schwartz 40google@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

Re: [DNSOP] Time for WGLC?

Hi Ben, > On 15 Jul 2020, at 00:38, Ben Schwartz > wrote: > > Oh, and regardless, we would like some agenda time. Thanks, we reserve a slot for the draft. > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 2:19 PM Ben Schwartz wrote: > DNSOP chairs, > > SVCB/HTTPS draft-01 has incorporated a lot of feedback, and I

Re: [DNSOP] OARConline 32b Workshop, August 11th, Registration and Call for Contributions now open

Hi all, A reminder that the presentation proposal submissions deadline for OARConline 32b is approaching. Please submit your abstracts by July 23rd (23:59 UTC) if you would like to present at the workshop, via: Regards, Ralph On 30-06-2020 12:30, Ralph