Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Call for Adoption: draft-belyavskiy-rfc5933-bis

2020-07-19 Thread Paul Vixie
On Sunday, 19 July 2020 07:52:39 UTC Ondřej Surý wrote: > I just want to point out, that I am certainly not overthinking this with my > implementors hat. The RFC and code-point puts pressure on the DNS vendors > to actually implement this „because there’s RFC“. ... i'm going to want to be able to

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Call for Adoption: draft-belyavskiy-rfc5933-bis

2020-07-19 Thread John Levine
In article <32cec795-45f3-48c7-bd42-dccfe0454...@isc.org> you write: >„because there’s RFC“. The whole reason for standardization is that there’s >interoperatibility >between the implementations - and just giving the code points without >implementing this >hardly fulfills that requirement. I tho

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Call for Adoption: draft-belyavskiy-rfc5933-bis

2020-07-19 Thread Ondřej Surý
I just want to point out, that I am certainly not overthinking this with my implementors hat. The RFC and code-point puts pressure on the DNS vendors to actually implement this „because there’s RFC“. The whole reason for standardization is that there’s interoperatibility between the implementati