The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name System Operations WG
(dnsop) to consider the following document: - 'NSEC and NSEC3 TTLs and NSEC
Aggressive Use'
as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Pleas
Paul
Thanks for the updated version.For those at home, the diffs are
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis-07&url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis-08
The Chairs would like the working group to review these changes. We're
looking for comments
before Monday April 26th.
tha
Tim Wicinski has requested publication of draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-ttl-04 as
Proposed Standard on behalf of the DNSOP working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-ttl/
___
DNSOP mailing list
All
I was gently reminded I had not closed out this WGLC
on draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-ttl.
It appears that all comments were addressed, and issues cleared.
The issues Mr. St. John's raised were worked through, though I'm going to
update my shepherd's
writeup to include a reference to his email.
than
On Apr 19, 2021, at 5:19 AM, Hollenbeck, Scott
wrote:
>
> Thanks for the update! I have a few minor suggestions after re-reading the
> draft.
>
> Section 1.1: "Academic research has been performed on QNAME minimisation
> [devries-qnamemin]. This work shows that QNAME minimisation in relaxed
