Re: [DNSOP] Consensus check on underscore names and draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis

> On 13 Jul 2021, at 11:13 pm, Brian Dickson > wrote: > > For example, in evaluating the break-points when partitioning the labels to > limit the total number of queries, the sequence COULD treat any contiguous > sequence of underscore labels as if it were a single label, and then do its > pa

Re: [DNSOP] Consensus check on underscore names and draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:01 AM Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > On 13 Jul 2021, at 6:22 am, Petr Špaček wrote: > > > > As Viktor pointed out in > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/w7JBD4czpGKr46v-DlycGbOv9zs/ > , it seems that this problem plagues roughly tens out of 150k domains he > surv

Re: [DNSOP] Consensus check on underscore names and draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis

> On 13 Jul 2021, at 6:22 am, Petr Špaček wrote: > > As Viktor pointed out in > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/w7JBD4czpGKr46v-DlycGbOv9zs/ , it > seems that this problem plagues roughly tens out of 150k domains he surveyed. > I think this makes further discussion about _necessity

Re: [DNSOP] Consensus check on underscore names and draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis

On 13. 07. 21 0:13, Brian Dickson wrote: On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 2:20 AM Petr Špaček > wrote: On 08. 07. 21 18:15, Brian Dickson wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 7:29 AM Petr Špaček mailto:pspa...@isc.org> >

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Consensus check on underscore names and draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis

On 13. 07. 21 0:28, Warren Kumari wrote: On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 6:18 PM Viktor Dukhovni wrote: [ Resending complete message, previous draft was incomplete... ] On 12 Jul 2021, at 11:18 am, Paul Hoffman wrote: The current text is sufficient to tell resolver developers, and resolver operat