Warren Kumari writes:
> This reply might have been a bit hasty -- I don't actually know how
> tightly this is specified, or who decided which DS algorithm should be
> used.
I'm not personally sure how the algorithms/other-properties are picked
for the IANA zones. I can certainly ask the IAB to
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 11:28:04AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> Looks like for arpa., the DS records are:
>
> arpa. 27247 IN DS 42581 8 1
> 778606D9623F843F156E7D11ACBF815EB67AB516
> arpa. 27247 IN DS 42581 8 2
> F28391C1ED4DC0F151EDD251A3
On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 1:39 PM Warren Kumari wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 12:13 PM Joe Abley wrote:
>
>> Hi Paul (W),
>>
>> On Sep 9, 2021, at 12:05, Paul Wouters wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, 9 Sep 2021, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Did you first ask the administrators of the zone in quest
On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 12:13 PM Joe Abley wrote:
> Hi Paul (W),
>
> On Sep 9, 2021, at 12:05, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 9 Sep 2021, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> >>
> >> Did you first ask the administrators of the zone in question before
> sending this message to a grooup that has no administra
Hi,
(Wes and Warren— cc’d as IAB and IESG members, do you guys have any further
guidance?)
> On Sep 9, 2021, at 12:12 PM, Joe Abley wrote
>
> The IETF (well, the IAB) has administrative control over the contents of the
> ARPA zone. I do not know in practice whether this extends to the machine
Hi Paul (W),
On Sep 9, 2021, at 12:05, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Sep 2021, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>>
>> Did you first ask the administrators of the zone in question before sending
>> this message to a grooup that has no administrative power over the zone?
>
> No, I used this group as the
On Thu, 9 Sep 2021, Paul Hoffman wrote:
On Sep 9, 2021, at 8:28 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
This is hinted strongly at in 2006:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4509#section-6.2
and even stronger via a MUST NOT in 2019's RFC 8624:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rf
On Sep 9, 2021, at 8:28 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> This is hinted strongly at in 2006:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4509#section-6.2
>
> and even stronger via a MUST NOT in 2019's RFC 8624:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8624#section-3.3
RFC 8624 is imp
Looks like for arpa., the DS records are:
arpa. 27247 IN DS 42581 8 1
778606D9623F843F156E7D11ACBF815EB67AB516
arpa. 27247 IN DS 42581 8 2
F28391C1ED4DC0F151EDD251A3103DCE0B9A5A251ACF6E24073771D7 1F3C40F9
Per our own recommendation
On 07. 09. 21 18:46, Wessels, Duane wrote:
Dan, thanks for the review. Responses are inline.
On Sep 1, 2021, at 3:12 AM, Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
wrote:
Minor issues:
1. In Section 4.1:
DNS clients MAY also enable TFO when possible.
Maybe I do not fully understand the intent he
10 matches
Mail list logo