[DNSOP] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-08: (with COMMENT)

2022-02-28 Thread Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-08: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-03.txt

2022-02-28 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 03:43:59PM +0100, Petr Špaček wrote: > Keep this: > >>> 3.2. Recommendation for validating resolvers > >>> Note that a validating resolver MUST still validate the signature > >>> over the NSEC3 record to ensure the iteration count was not altered > >>> sinc

Re: [DNSOP] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-07

2022-02-28 Thread Lars Eggert
Dale, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On 2021-8-14, at 13:34, Dale Worley via Datatracker wrote: > > Reviewer: Dale Worley > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Re

[DNSOP] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-08: (with COMMENT)

2022-02-28 Thread Lars Eggert via Datatracker
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-08: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-03.txt

2022-02-28 Thread Petr Špaček
On 26. 02. 22 0:40, Wes Hardaker wrote: Petr Špaček writes: First, I perceive a "problem" with the current document structure: 2. Recommendation for zone publishers . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.1. Algorithms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.2. Flags