Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bcp-05: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
https://w
e ICANN / IETF divide, so IETF shouldn't wade
>> into ICANN territory.
>
> We don't know what ICANN considers an attempt to "wade into ICANN territory,"
> and there's nothing the WG can do to resolve this question. Such questions
> are why we have liaisons, which the IAB administers for the IETF
Suzanne,
On Oct 18, 2022, at 6:50 AM, Suzanne Woolf wrote:
> We don't know what ICANN considers an attempt to "wade into ICANN territory,"
> and there's nothing the WG can do to resolve this question.
I’m unsure the protocols here, but the WG could request the IAB to have the
IETF Liaison to t
Warren Kumari writes:
> 1: as we've already seen, nothing stops people from just using whatever names
> they want[0], and so there is no guarantee that registry would be complete and
> correct.
So the interesting side-point is that what happens with people that
don't want to go through the proce
Martin Schanzenbach writes:
> Wouldn't such a WG need the .alt as a prerequisite to any actual work or
> at least have .alt as its first work item?
Actually, that's only one solution. It's the easiest and hence the
reason it's being preferred.
The probably *right* solution is to fix all the do
On 17/10/2022 23.28, Benno Overeinder wrote:
The DNSOP WG chairs welcome feedback on the draft
draft-homburg-add-codcp, Control Options For DNS Client Proxies
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-homburg-add-codcp/).
I find it a bit weird for a client to *choose* how the proxy/resolver
mi
Hi,
your response does not address my comments.
1. whis is this an informational RFC and not a standard track RFC.
2. What is requested from IANA. ths text you wrote and I copied is not a
directive to IANA that is clear
Roni
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 2:44 PM Макаренко Борис
wrote:
> Hello, Roni!
>
Not meaning to pick personally on Eliot or Paul, some of these issues are very
difficult to separate.
> On Oct 17, 2022, at 11:53 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2022, Eliot Lear wrote:
>
> > Let's please leave Internet lawyering to lawyers. If people want a legal
> > opinion o
