I have been on vacation this week and am just seeing this thread now. Now that
a bunch of people have spoken up on the topic, if someone wants to propose a
*specific* change to the definition in draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis, this would
be a very good time to do it, given that we are after WG
>> > Well, one would, in fact, expect a delegation to be a
>> > non-authoritative answer:
>>
>> Yes, but one would presume that before any of the two above
>> queries were sent, the recursive resolver already have cached the
>> delegation for jshsos.ksyunv5.com.
>
> It doesn't matter, there can be
