> On 17 Jan 2024, at 20:42, Matt Brown via Datatracker via dnsdir
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Matt Brown
> Review result: Ready
>
> I have been selected as the DNS Directorate reviewer for this draft.
> The draft itself is clear and understandable. Both the language and the
> substance of th
Reviewer: Matt Brown
Review result: Ready
I have been selected as the DNS Directorate reviewer for this draft. The DNS
Directorate seeks to review all DNS or DNS-related drafts as they pass through
IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose
of the review is to pr
On Jan 17, 2024, at 05:15, Bellebaum, Thomas
wrote:
>
> 1. Caching of unrequested RRs would actually be fine, if they are
> properly signed. At worst, a resolver would cache irrelevant records.
This is not entirely true. By tailoring someone’s cache you might be able to
track them. There is
Dear DNSOP WG,
I closed the doodle poll to select a suitable day and time. The
selected day and time is *January 30, 2024, 17:00-18:00 UTC*.
I will schedule the interim in the datatracker and more information
about the interim meeting will appear on the mailing list.
Best regards,
-- Ben
> That's cache poisoning. Search for "Eugene Kashpureff" to learn all
> about it.
There is a relation in the sense that checking RRs for relevance to the
query is mentioned as a partial defense against cache poisoning in RFC
3833, section 2.3.
Note however some differences:
1. Caching of unrequ
