On 11. 01. 24 18:34, Bellebaum, Thomas wrote:
Hello,
We have been looking at some DNS resolvers and encountered a question:
When a DNS response contains (in the answer section) records which were
not requested, how should the resolver react to those and what should
it return to the requesting c
On 17. 01. 24 21:42, Matt Brown via Datatracker wrote:
The proposal has been discussed in the dnsop group and previous meetings and my
observation of the discussion is that there is both broad agreement that
QDCOUNT > 1 is not used in practice and at least some supporting evidence
presented that
On 18 Jan 2024, at 13:42, Petr Špaček wrote:
> The only piece missing to make it *perfect* is "MUST use QDCOUNT=1", or in
> other words, banning QDCOUNT=0 usage with DNS COOKIES. It's unnecessary
> complexity.
I think these are two different suggestions:
(1) Update the cookies spec to require
As a what-one-stub-resolver-does data point...
The resolver I'm most familiar with validates that all the CNAME records
form a single chain from the query name, and that all answer records of the
query type match the final name at the end of the CNAME chain. If that is
not true, as in the case of
Really, cancel culture.
It’s a couple of lines of code in a nameserver to support QCOUNT=0. It will
take more time debating this than it took to implement support for QCOUNT=0.
> On 19 Jan 2024, at 00:22, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> On 18 Jan 2024, at 13:42, Petr Špaček wrote:
>
>> The only piece
