Perfect idea, very good use of the Wednesday slot.
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 at 13:57, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
> > Il 11 marzo 2019 alle 18.02 Stephane Bortzmeyer ha
> scritto:
> >
> > It was suggested Reference necessary to have a
> > side meeting in Prague at IETF 104. I propose monday, 1400-1600
I'd appreciate it not conflicting with IRTFOPEN. The ANRP topics include
how Facebook manipulates routing and a big study on QUIC, and I think there
should be participant overlap.
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 at 13:22, Melinda Shore
wrote:
> On 3/11/19 9:13 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > I admit I'm
Reviewer: Allison Mankin
Review result: Almost Ready
Overall Comment - there is a lot of illumination in here, but one overall point
and a few smaller ones explain why I rated the draft Almost Ready, rather than
Ready.
The overall points is that it should give the reader more guidance. It is
Really glad you sent this, Giovane! Thank you
On Wednesday, 18 July 2018, Giovane C. M. Moura
wrote:
>
>
> Hello Folks,
>
> So in the end of today's session, I briefly mention that there will be 4
> presentations on MAPRG tomorrow about DNS. After that, some people told
> me they'd would have li
Hi Stephen,
We're glad you drew this important point to our attention, but it appears
to be needed for draft-ietf-dprive-dns-over-tls rather than this draft. In
this draft we don't touch on the privacy/TLS motivation for TCP at all,
leaving all that for the dprive draft.
The dprive draft has jus
Patches to unbound by Sara Dickinson (Sinodun) that are part of the
DNS-over-TLS aka T-DNS project:
Patches:
https://portal.sinodun.com/stash/projects/TDNS/repos/dns-over-tls_patches/browse
On Jul 2, 2015 6:09 PM, "Daniel Kahn Gillmor" wrote:
> On Thu 2015-07-02 16:20:30 -0400, Tom Ritter wrot
Expected that this would create an automatic mail to the WG but it
apparently is not going to, so here is a signal boost for a disclosure
filed yesterday:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2539/
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/m
I support adoption because operators are using this spec. I plan to review
and also to encourage a few others who have reviews to contribute.
On 28 October 2014 08:50, Suzanne Woolf wrote:
> Dear DNSOP WG,
>
> This draft documents the specification, use, and cautions regarding the
> "client-sub
A new session Thursday evening is good for the starttls presenter.
Allison
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
>
> On 3/4/14, 8:13 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, March 4, 2014, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>
>> DNSop folks,
>>
>> If we created a new session in the thurs
