Deborah Brungard has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-13: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for writing! Agree with the suggested tweaks, Spencer's, clarifying "update" and Ben's comments. On Informational vs. BCP, I'm leaning towards BCP. As noted in the Shepherd writeup, this is based on practice and improving interoperability, to me, it is a different "type" of terminology document than others which are labeled informational. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
